www.courant.com/community/vernon/hc-lapointe-hearing-0708-20100707,0,3352646.story
BY HILDA MUÑOZ, hmunoz@courant.com
9:35 PM EDT, July 7, 2010
VERNON
— A public defender and a commercial litigation attorney who
previously represented Richard Lapointe, a mentally handicapped
man serving a life sentence in the 1987 rape and murder of an
88-year-old woman, testified Wednesday in Superior Court in
Rockville.
Christopher Cosgrove, Lapointe's public defender during the
criminal trial, and Henry Theodore Vogt, who sought a new trial
for Lapointe in the late 1990s, testified during the latest
hearing seeking a new trial for Lapointe.
Lapointe was convicted in 1992 of raping and killing Bernice
Martin, his wife's grandmother, and then setting her apartment
on fire. Lapointe and his wife have since divorced.
Paul Casteleiro, Lapointe's current lawyer, focused on what
Cosgrove and Vogt didn't do when they handled the case in court.
The time that the fire was ignited and how long it burned
weren't addressed during the trial, Cosgrove testified. Timing
would have been addressed if notes from a detective — estimating
that the fire burned for 30 to 40 minutes before Lapointe called
police — had been made available to the defense, he said. But
the detective's note didn't surface until after the trial.
Casteleiro argues that the burn time could help Lapointe prove
he was with his family at their Manchester condo when the fire
at Martin's apartment started.
When he sought a new trial, Vogt alleged that Lapointe's public
defenders were ineffective.
On Wednesday, Casteleiro asked Vogt why he didn't question the
public defenders about key evidence that Vogt claimed they
should have used during the trial.
In several instances Wednesday, Vogt said he did not recall what
he asked or did not ask the attorneys during the hearing in the
late 1990s. But he did agree that he relied on testimony from a
legal expert to prove that Lapointe had had ineffective
representation.
Casteleiro rested after Vogt's testimony and state prosecutor
Michael O'Hare called a fire expert to the witness stand to
refute previous testimony of John D. DeHaan, an expert called by
the defense.
Robert Corry, a self-employed fire investigator, said the fire
set on Bernice Martin's couch was a low-energy fire that mostly
smoldered.
Unlike DeHaan, a criminalist and fire investigator from
California, who had testified that the fire on the couch burned
for about 10 minutes, Corry said determining the longevity of
the fire is difficult. He said it could have smoldered for some
time.
Corry estimated that the fire was set between 5:45 p.m. when
Martin was seen throwing out garbage and about 7 p.m., when her
daughter couldn't reach her on the telephone.
He also contradicted DeHaan's testimony that the temperature
inside the home was 400 degrees when firefighters arrived. Corry
said the firefighters would have been burned if the temperature
was that high, but they were not injured.
Copyright © 2010, The Hartford Courant