www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-hc-richard-lapointe-0507.artmay07,0,7507005.story
By DAVID OWENS
The Hartford Courant
May 7, 2010
ROCKVILLE —
Nearly 21 years ago, as Richard Lapointe was confessing to
raping and killing Bernice Martin and setting fire to her
Manchester apartment, a Manchester detective stopped by
Lapointe's condominium.
It was the Fourth of July 1989, and Det. Michael Morrissey
arrived in the late afternoon to question Karen Martin. Back at
Manchester police headquarters, detectives were in the midst of
a 9½-hour interrogation of Lapointe, during which he confessed
three times to the crime.
Karen Martin was called to testify Thursday at a hearing on what
is likely her former husband's last chance to win a new trial. A
jury found him guilty of murder, capital felony, arson murder
and other crimes in 1992, and he was sentenced to life in
prison.
Karen Martin answered a few questions from Lapointe's lawyer,
Paul Casteleiro.
"Do you recall the day your grandmother died?" Casteleiro asked.
"Yes, I do, it was a Sunday," she responded. She recounted her
family's Sunday routine — go to church, visit with her
88-year-old grandmother, Bernice Martin, then go home for Sunday
dinner. That evening a relative called to say that she could not
get in touch with Bernice Martin and that she wanted Richard
Lapointe to check on her, Karen Martin recalled.
"Richard went over," she said. "He left the house. He went over
there. The next thing I know [police] officers were there
telling me I had to go to the hospital."
Casteleiro asked what time Lapointe left. "It was 7 o'clock,"
she responded. "I remember the time."
But at a hearing several years ago, and during Morrissey's
tape-recorded interview with her in July 1989, Martin said that
Lapointe left their condo at 8 p.m. to go to Bernice Martin's
apartment. Casteleiro asked Martin if she remembered saying
that. No, she responded.
Casteleiro and a group of people supporting Lapointe contend
that the timing is an important piece of information in their
quest to win Lapointe a new trial. They argue that Lapointe did
not have enough time to commit the crime, and that evidence
about how long the fire in Bernice Martin's apartment burned
provides Lapointe with an alibi. Superior Court Judge John J.
Nazzaro will decide.
With Martin not able to recall much of her July 4, 1989,
interview with Morrissey, Casteleiro played a recording of it
that Morrissey made. Two-thirds of the recording was played
Thursday and the rest is to be played when the hearing resumes
this morning.
On the portion heard Thursday, Martin offered little to help
police. She said that Lapointe left their home about 8 p.m. and
that the only other time he was away from the house that
afternoon was for about 20 minutes when he walked the dog. The
911 call reporting the fire came at 8:27 p.m.
With fireworks audible in the background, Morrissey pressed on,
telling Martin that the March 8, 1987, killing of her
grandmother had been solved and that her husband had done it.
"The investigation is over," Morrissey, who is now retired, told
her. "We're here for the why. Why did this happen?" But Martin,
who, like Lapointe, is disabled, could offer no explanation to
the detective.
Lapointe's supporters have criticized Manchester police for the
long interrogation of Lapointe, contending that they coerced the
mentally challenged man into confessing three times to a crime
he did not commit. Those same supporters, who have attended the
hearing now underway at Superior Court in Rockville, expressed
shock when they heard Morrissey's questioning of Karen Lapointe.
"We're sure he's responsible for what happened to Mrs. Martin,"
Morrissey told Karen Martin. "There's a lot of reasons for
that." Morrissey mentioned DNA evidence when, in fact, there was
none.
Police have defended their questioning of Lapointe, saying that
they employed tactics that police commonly use and that have
been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Copyright © 2010, The Hartford Courant